Category Archives: AmeriKKKa the Bootiful
- Al Jolson Commemorative Blackface Competition
- Book signing by Rachel Dolezal
- A demonstration of African-American cooking by Paula Deen
- Showing of Driving Miss Daisy in the White House screening room (invitation only)
- Black English, A Precious Legacy: Justin Bieber recounts the exciting story behind his invention of the word “crunk.”
- A panel discussion of “Post-Racial America” featuring Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, HUD Secretary Ben Carson, and former US Representative Allen West
- TED Talk on African American heroes: That guy who invented peanut butter
- A Festival of African-American Musical Contributions: Alternating Program. Wednesday & Friday evenings – A Vanilla Ice Retrospective. Thursday and Saturday evenings – The Queen of Soul (Celine Dion sings Aretha’s greatest hits)
- Touch My Hair! Teams of traveling stylists will set up booths along the Mall to provide makeovers and tips: dreads, weaves, braids, twists, cornrows and more for white people hair!
- Celebrating Black Literary Representation: Guest lecture by Lionel Shriver
- Special Kennedy Center performance by the cast of Hidden Fences
In recent months and especially weeks, rhetoric about Trump-as-Hitler and “this is how Nazism got started” has taken on a life of its own and become a kind of internet “truth.”
Or maybe it’s more like a joint at a party: it gets passed from hand to hand and you never know how many people have spit on it.
In one sense, the comparison is facile and even offensive, but we’ve also become accustomed to just about everything being compared to Hitler.
Google the phrase “is like Hitler,” and here’s what comes up (aside, obviously, from Donald Trump):
- Angela Merkel
- Ireland’s Minister for Defence, Enda Kenny
- Apple, Inc.
- Justin Bieber
- Beppe Grillo, leader of Italy’s Five-Star Movement party
- Kanye West
- Bernie Sanders
- late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
- Boris Johnson
- Mitt Romney
- Nick Saban, the head football coach at the University of Alabama (but in a good way)
- comedian Adam Carolla
- Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari
- film director Michael Bay
- Pablo Iglesias, the leader of Spain’s Podemos Movement
- Dutch Party for Freedom leader Geert Wilders
- former Governor Raji Fashola of Lagos, Nigeria
- former Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán
- the late Palestine poet Mahmoud Darwish,
- former Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
- the late Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez
- Garrosh Hellscream, a character in the multiplayer online role-playing game, World of Warcraft
- the owner of Mr. Ho’s Chinese restaurant in Troy, Alabama
- George W. Bush
- Turkey’s president Recep Erdoğan
- Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi
- Wisconsin’s Governor Scott Walker
- Obama (a lot)
The reason for all of that may be, in part, because it’s about the worst thing people can think of to say about someone else; because there’s a belief that “we” are so inured to horror that only extreme hyperbole will get our attention; because making outrageous and exaggerated comparisons is one of the elements of humor (successful or not); because of Godwin’s Rule of Nazi Analogies; because it’s easier than actually making a case for why someone is a violent, totalitarian, genocidal sociopath; and because there’s a fuckton of people alive today who have absolutely no clue who Hitler actually was or what was happening in Germany in the 1930s.
All of that said, the real point here is the Trump-as-Hitler comparison, which is directly connected in its current usage to urgent calls to “do something”: to not be complacent, to “get out there” and “fight for your freedoms,” to not let “this” happen in America, to recognise the “emergency for democracy” that is taking place, to “stop Trump” before it’s too late, etc., all of which seem slyly (or bluntly) to evoke criticisms of the Germans, the Poles, and other Europeans during WWII who “let” Hitler destroy most of the continent, terrify the world, and murder untold millions of people. (The American government, in fact, also “let” Hitler have his way for much of his reign of terror, but that’s another story.)
What we’re taught (or, at least, I was taught) was that “they” should have done something to stop Hitler—either as he was coming to power or after he was firmly at the helm of the Third Reich. Instead, they chose to be “good Germans” and look the other way. They were complicit. They were guilty.
What could they have done, exactly? Well, they could certainly have done something. They should at least have gone out and gotten themselves shot (as if that would have “stopped” anything).
So my question is this, and it is an absolutely serious one. What are “we” supposed to do? If Trump is Hitler and if his election is going to bring waves of nationalism and racial profiling and mass deportations and concentration camps and ultramilitarized police and dismantling of human- and civil-rights protections … what are “we” supposed to do so as not to end up as “good Germans”?
I’ve got one vote. In my past experience with election campaigns, I can wave signs, do phone banking, register voters, donate money. How many people will that convince to vote my way who weren’t already planning to do so? I would submit that the answer is a pitifully small number. With phone banking in particular, which is the Democratic party’s key grassroots strategy (or, at least, it was in 2008 and 2012), calls go out almost exclusively to people who are ALREADY Democrats and who, if they vote, are going to vote for your candidate anyway.
I could post “Trump is Hitler” on Facebook and Twitter on an hourly basis for the next three-and-a-half-months, which seems to be what a signifcant number of liberals/Dems/NeverTrumpers/pro-Hillary bloggers have in mind, evidently because doing so isn’t at all alienating and has been conclusively proven to change people’s minds.
So forget that. Should I be marching and waving placards? OK, where? Should I be throwing myself in front of a tank? OK, where? But more importantly, why? In other words, what concrete impact will either action have on stopping
If Trump is elected, what should “we” do?
“We” didn’t stop President Roosevelt from rounding up American citizens of Japanese descent and putting them in concentration camps in 1942.
“We” didn’t stop Reagan from dismantling the social-safety net and creating a nation of homeless people.
“We” didn’t stop Bill Clinton from expanding police and judicial powers and putting hundreds of thousands of black people behind bars for decades for petty crimes or from wringing his hands as Rwandans hacked each other to death with machetes.
“We” didn’t stop Bush from invading Iraq and Afghanistan.
“We” didn’t make Obama take action to stop Assad from turning Syria into the killing fields.
So if we are witnessing the last gasp of American-style democracy, if we are truly at that moment in which the United States veers inexorably toward totalitarianism, and if, because of the historical example of Hitler, we are conscious that Trumpencian rhetoric may lead us down a similar road, what are we to do? What specifically? And how will it work?
Again, I am asking in complete seriousness and with no small amount of desperation.
Because I truly do not see a way in our system, short of assassinations, armed civil war, or making friends with my local “preppers” MeetUp Group, to keep a sitting president and an elected Congress, whose majority is from that president’s party, from doing substantially what they want.
I don’t see a way to “stop” a police force or the military or the national guard, if they should be deployed.
I am beginning to have my doubts that average Germans could ever have “stopped” Hitler … the ones who wanted to, I mean. People of all nationalities and faiths across Europe resisted; they did what they could … and not a few of them died in the effort. But they didn’t “stop” him.
If Trump’s deportation orders go into effect, what will we do to keep people from being deported? What can we do?
If our Muslim friends, neighbors, and community members are forced at gunpoint to leave their homes and report to concentration camps, how do we put an end to that program?
If this is the tipping point, and if, unlike our grandparents’ and great-grandparents’ generation, we have ample warning, what is our plan?
One thing I know for sure: Twitter will not save us.
List of Entertainers Revealed for Republican National Convention
Donald Trump’s Favorite Groups Join the Lineup
- Andrew Jackson 5
- Bell Biv DeVoeter Suppression
- Bleach Boys
- Boy George Wallace
- Simply Redlining
- Counting Jim Crows
- Credence Blackwater Revival
- Diana Ross and the Supremacists
- Dixiecrat Chicks
- Earth, Gone With The Wind, and Fire
- Electric White Orchestra
- Elton Whites-Only John
- Glad You’re White & the Pips
- Harold Melvin & the Blue Lives Matter Notes
- I Don’t See Color Me Badd
- Guns N’ Rednecks
- KKKool and the Gang
- Militia Etheridge
- Mumford and Sons of the Confederacy
- Peckerwood Mac
- Peter, Paula Deen, and Mary
- Extreme and Unnecessary Force MDs
- Roxanne Seanhannité
- Enron Vogue
- TLC (These Lying Crackas)
- The New Jim Croce
- The Police and More Police
- Tower of White Power
- Vanilla ICE Raids
- Woodrow Wilson Phillips
“Cleveland Convention Musical Acts” began several months ago as a joke on the Facebook page of writer, preacher, and master cake stylist, Marvin K. White, who deserves all credit for launching the challenge “’Copy & Paste’ is my favorite white supremacist musical group. What’s yours?’” In a matter of minutes, his many friends had responded with more than 100 band names, of which I’ve chosen only 30. Now that the terrifying spectacle of the 2016 Republican National Convention is upon us, this seems a good time to pull them out again. Individual credits go to:
1 – Jordan Rogers; 2, 15, 23, 24 – Jonathan Darr King; 3, 6, 9, 11 – Dana Kletter; 5 – Cedric Brown; 19 – Maren Haynes Marchesini; 4, 8, 18, 20, 21 – Wendell Ricketts; 7, 10, 26, 29 – Marvin K. White; 13, 17, 25, 28 – Saqib Keval; 14 – Terry De Grace-Morris; 16 – Jilchristina Vest; 22 – Rakiyah Canty; 26 – Jeremy William Proctor; 30 – LB Johnson
My rhetorical question for Tuesday morning: If Omar Mateen had been inspired to kill queers by the teachings of the Westboro Baptist Church rather than by the teachings of ISIS, would we be calling the Orlando massacre an act of “terrorism”?
The United States of NRA want us to believe in terrorism because that makes us feel scared. We’ll accept the lack of gun regulation—hell, we might even buy a gun. We’ll accept unfettered
spying intelligence-gathering on American citizens.
Anything, in fact, as long as it doesn’t require addressing why so many Americans hate—hate women, hate queer people, hate transgender people, hate black and brown people—enough to kill them.
The media and too much of the public—dragged along by the idiot rhetoric of self-serving politicians—continue to insist that Islam and Muslims are the problem.
They refuse to acknowledge that the real problem was hating queer people.
Because, in a lot of cases, that would require them to bomb themselves.
After appearing first in this-is-barely-journalism online scandal sheets like Towleroad, reports of Marco Rubio’s alleged “gay past” have now made it all the way to the Washington Post, and more’s the pity.
The “story,” to the extent one can be said to exist, is a masterpiece of innuendo, insinuation, and plain, old nudge-nudge-wink-wink gossip. In May 1990, when he was 18 years old, Rubio “was arrested for being in a crime-plagued public park after closing time.”
The “crime-plagued park,” also described as “notorious” (code-word alert) in the screechy reports now zooming around the internet, as well as “a haven for drug dealers, prostitutes and gang members,” was also apparently known for sexual encounters between men in which many things may have changed hands, but cash was not one of them.
In specific, however, what Rubio was actually arrested for was drinking beer inside a closed car with a friend. He never went to court; he was never convicted of anything; the charges were eventually dismissed.
The court file, meanwhile “been has destroyed,” the Washington Post says, in one of those irresponsible uses of the passive voice in English that strongly implies an ominous conspiracy (just in time for the new X-Files), but ignores the near certainty that most twenty-five-year-old records for misdemeanor arrests in which the charges were dismissed have also been destroyed. (But “destroyed” sounds so much more dramatic than “sent to the shredder because we needed the space.”)
Since this not-really-a-story broke, the queer media in particular has been throwing around phrases like “closet queen” and “hypocrisy” like there’s no tomorrow.
And they ought to be ashamed of themselves.
First of all, there is absolutely no reason to think that Rubio was in the park because he was having sex with, intended to have sex with, or even wanted to have sex with, another man.
There is no proof that he was there for some reason other than to drink beer in public at an age when he wasn’t legally entitled to do so.
And no one has said any different—at least not anyone who has talked so far.
Second, let’s suppose it’s true. Let’s suppose he was there to cruise for dick. Are we really arguing that a teenager who, at 18-going-on-19, might have been living the vida loca couldn’t grow up to be heterosexual? Or might not have decided, for religious or other reasons, that whatever he was doing, or thinking about doing, with other men, he ought to quit it?
In other words, can we stop insisting on the one-drop (of semen) rule?
Third, and most importantly, Marco Rubio is evil. He is a right-wing, Christian fundamentalist, anti-abortion horror show who denies both rape and climate change with approximately equal enthusiasm.
But the great thing about the American Dream is that none of that is any obstacle to becoming one of the Horsemen of the Apocalypse!
No, you can be one of the most terrifying politicians to have come along since the McCarthy era and still be a) a closeted homosexual; b) an out homosexual; c) a heterosexual; d) someone who used to be gay but isn’t anymore; e) a homosexually-oriented but exclusively heterosexual-behaving man or woman; f) a man or woman with naughty erotic fantasies that are, in any case, nobody else’s business; or g) all of the above at different points in time.
In the meanwhile, getting all Dowager Countess of Grantham-sniffy over his supposed “gay past” is just a way to imply that there’s something inherently shameful and indecent about being gay.
Anyone worried about the potential victory of the Tea Party Jihad in America should be shaking with Chikungunya-fever-like chills over Rubio’s politics. The man is despicable.
But not because of a little (alleged) adolescent fellatio.